Revision strategy

How to revise for FRCR Part 1 Physics.

First FRCR comprises Anatomy and Physics modules. The Physics module is a 40-question multiple choice examination delivered over 2 hours, with five True/False items per question and 200 independently marked statements in total. The revision approach below is built around that format rather than around reading time.

What the exam is testing

The RCR describes the purpose of the Physics assessment as understanding the physical principles that underpin image generation, the rational selection of imaging modalities, the recognition and cause of artefacts, risk, safety and quality, and the justification of ionising radiation exposures. Read as revision instructions, that means the paper rewards three things:

  • Mechanism. Why a signal exists at all, and what physically produces contrast in each modality.
  • Direction of change. If a parameter increases, what happens to noise, resolution, dose, contrast or scan time — and whether the relationship is linear, inverse or conditional.
  • Consequence in practice. Artefact recognition, safety rules and the reasoning behind justification of exposures.

Current RCR candidate guidance also notes that syllabus sections 4.22, 4.23 and 4.24 relating to molecular imaging are not currently examined. Confirm the position for your own sitting before you decide to skip anything.

Dividing time across the eight headings

The current RCR Physics distribution is set out below. It tells you how the marks are spread; it does not tell you how long you personally need on each heading. Weight your time by the product of exam weight and your own weakness, not by question count alone.

RCR headingQuestionsStatements
Matter and radiation315
Radiography and fluoroscopy630
Radionuclide imaging630
Radiation safety630
CT630
MRI630
Ultrasound630
Other15

Two practical consequences. First, no single heading can carry you: six questions is thirty statements, so a strong modality is worth real marks but not a pass on its own. Second, Matter and radiation is small in question count yet underpins attenuation, interactions and dose concepts that appear inside other headings, so it is usually a poor place to economise.

The three-stage loop

Stage 1

Learn the concept

Short, focused reading on one mechanism or relationship. Stop when you can state it in one sentence and say which direction each variable moves.

Stage 2

Answer statements

Immediately work stems on that concept. Commit to all five items before revealing anything. The statement is the test, the reading was only preparation.

Stage 3

Diagnose the misconception

For each wrong item, name the failure: missing fact, wrong direction, unit or magnitude, misread condition, or misapplied rule. Write the corrected principle, not the question.

The loop is deliberately short. A block of ten stems with honest diagnosis beats an afternoon of reading, because it produces a list of specific corrections instead of a general feeling of familiarity.

Error logs and spaced review, kept small

An error log is useful only while it stays smaller than your practice. Keep one line per corrected misconception, in this shape:

Heading · the statement that caught you · the corrected principle · the failure type

  • Review the log at the start of the next session, not at the end of the current one.
  • Re-test entries by answering fresh statements on the same concept rather than rereading your own line.
  • Retire an entry after two clean re-tests, so the log shrinks as your accuracy improves.
  • Cap note-making at roughly ten minutes per hour of practice. If notes take longer, the ratio is wrong.

When to move from topic blocks to mocks

  • Topic blocks while a heading is still being learnt. You know a block is finished when your errors are edge cases rather than mechanisms.
  • Mixed blocks once two or three headings are secure. Mixing forces you to identify the modality and the relevant principle before answering, which is what the paper actually demands.
  • Timed full mocks in the final phase, spaced so that each mock is followed by repair work. Two well-reviewed mocks are worth more than five unreviewed ones.

An adaptable 12-week framework

This is an example, not a prescription. Compress or extend it around clinical commitments and your own diagnostic results.

Weeks 1–2

Baseline and foundations: review the official format, Matter and Radiation, radiography and fluoroscopy, and radiation safety. Work untimed topic blocks and read explanations after each complete stem.

Weeks 3–4

CT and MRI: build the core acquisition, image-quality, artefact, dose and safety relationships. Add short retrieval blocks from the first fortnight.

Weeks 5–6

Ultrasound and radionuclide imaging: connect wave or decay physics to detector behaviour, artefacts, safety and practical image formation.

Weeks 7–8

First consolidation: rotate across all headings, revisit recurring misconceptions and introduce longer mixed blocks without abandoning focused repair work.

Weeks 9–10

Timed performance: use an exam-length mock, separate incorrect from unanswered items, and complete targeted recovery blocks before another full paper.

Weeks 11–12

Final consolidation and taper: use one final representative mock early enough to review it, revisit a small error log, protect sleep and avoid opening large new resources in the final 72 hours.

Common inefficient revision behaviours

Rewriting textbooks

Long, linear notes feel productive and generate almost no retrieval. Notes should be short and written after you got something wrong, not before you have tested it.

Reading explanations passively

If you read the explanation before committing to an answer, you lose the diagnostic signal. Commit to all five statements first, then read.

Rehearsing strengths

Repeatedly practising the modality you enjoy inflates confidence. Let the error log, not preference, choose the next block.

Timing too early

Timing added before concepts are secure trains speed at guessing. Add timing once you can justify why a statement is true or false.

Collecting resources

Switching between several banks and courses replaces practice with logistics. One primary source plus the official RCR guidance is enough.

Ignoring the boundary cases

Most incorrect statements are true-in-general but false in a stated edge case. Note the condition that flipped it, not just the fact.

Start the loop today

Work five complete stems with no account to calibrate where you are, then use the exam-length mock once a few headings feel secure.

Physics revision guides

Choose your next guide

Practise what you have revised

Work five complete stems with no account, or sit an exam-length mock with a free account.

Further reading

The Physics Bank is independent examination preparation. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the Royal College of Radiologists. Exam rules change: always check the current RCR candidate guidance for your own sitting.